|
"Johannesburg gives us a solid basis
for implementation and action to go forward," Desai said. "Although
the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation is only some 50 pages long,
in many ways it is more targeted and more focused than Agenda 21.
We have agreed on global priorities for action and we have agreed
to take action."
Nitin Desai, Summit Secretary-General
|
"I think we have to be careful not
to expect conferences like this to produce miracles. But we do expect
conferences like this to generate political commitment, momentum
and energy for the attainment of the goals."
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan
|
|
"People forget that there was no agreement
on energy at Rio and issues such as production and consumption almost
did not make it into Agenda 21, and although it did
it was only a very general statement. At Johannesburg, we agreed
on a 10-year programme on production and consumption, a concept
that not only will affect the developing countries, but the development
of the richer countries as well."
Nitin Desai, Summit Secretary-General
|
"We invited the leaders of the world
to come here and commit themselves to sustainable development, to
protecting our planet, to maintaining the essential balance and
to go back home and take action. It is on the ground that we will
have to test how really successful we are. But we have started off
well. Johannesburg is a beginning. I am not saying Johannesburg
is the end of it. It is a beginning."
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan
|
|
"We have missed an opportunity to increase
energy production from non-polluting sources like solar, biomass,
and wind, and to provide the many companies taking action to reduce
emissions with a secure framework for their actions."
Jonathan Lash, World Resources Institute President
|
"Governments failed to do the job". "Now it's up
to all of us."
Greenpeace's report card on the Summit's performance gave it
failing marks overall against nearly every benchmark it had set
for success.
Steve Sawyer, Greenpeace Climate Policy Director
|
|
Sustainable Development is dead. It's demise
came, ironically, at the World Summit on Sustainable Development.
CorpWatch
|
"WSSD demonstrated that solidarity
and commitment are growing everywhere. Peoples of all sectors came
to Johannesburg ready to build bridges, to integrate efforts, to
propose new and creative ideas that would keep the concept of sustainable
development as the priority of the worlds agenda for the future.
What a pity only a few governments were ready to meet the challenge!"
Yolanda Kakabadse, IUCN
President
|
| BASD - The
Business Conclusion - A little less conversation a little more
action
"Lastly, business acknowledges
the need for it to be accountable and transparent in all its activities.
Responsible business is committed to corporations setting targets
and reporting openly and honestly on their progress. It is only
through such transparency and open reporting that trust can be built
the trust that is essential to partnerships. Through this
reporting we will also be able to measure the progress towards the
more sustainable development in the years to come which business
is committed to deliver."
Mark Moody-Stuart, Chairman of Business Action for Sustainable Development
|
Dialogue of
the Deaf
The needs of many were once again compromised
to accommodate the
demands of a powerful few at the recent World Summit on Sustainable
Development held in Johannesburg, South Africa. Given the alarming
tilt
towards self-interest and unilateralism by the rich, will the concerns
of poor countries ever be addressed in global negotiations? A revamped
and empowered United Nations is the only hope for multilateralism
Anju Sharma, Richard Mahapatra and Clifford Polycarp, Rio+10
|
|
FoE
10
years on Earth Summit fails to pass the test - Not Satisfactory:
Must Do Better
"This Summit has failed the poor and
vulnerable peoples of the world. It has not reached agreement on
the radical action - with clear timetables and targets - needed
to tackle the world's environmental problems, from climate change
and renewable energy to forest and species loss. The world's Governments
must agree to meet again and determine that next time they will
do better."
Ricardo Navarro, Chair of Friends of the Earth International
|
"...like others we are conscious of
the limited achievements of the summit, especially with respect
to environmental measures and targets. With the exception of the
important new commitment on the sanitation target to halve the number
of the worlds poor without access to clear drinking water
by 2015, the Summit Implementation Plan is an eclectic mix of past
commitments, which have still to be acted on by governments."
TUAC Press Release
|
| WWF believes that the Plan
of Implementation as it currently stands will not provide significant
movement forwards from commitments made in Rio and since. In some
cases the text actually constitutes a step backwards (trade and globalization,
principles).
The Summit failed to address energy issues,
the harmful effects of trade liberalization and subsidies, made
lukewarm statements to support the Biodiversity Convention, and
compromised on toxic chemicals to the extent that the outcome was
weaker than previous international agreements.
WWF
Summary
|
"I am satisfied that what has been
delivered is a step forward. While there will be disappointment
that nations failed to agree global time tables and targets for
boosting the level of renewable energy, it has been agreed that
there is a need for regional and national targets for renewable
energy. We also have a commitment to halve the number of people
without access to sanitation"
Klaus Töpfer , UNEP's Executive Director closing
statement
|